← EYMA Dispatch

Agent Intake

How AI Agents Request Homeowners Insurance Quotes (And What Agencies Need to Know)

EYMA · September 30, 2026

A homeowners RFQ is not an auto RFQ with the vehicle fields swapped out. Property underwriting requires a completely different data set — dwelling type, year built, square footage, roof age and material, construction type, prior claims history, desired replacement cost — and the consumer's authorization to pull a CLUE property report before any carrier can quote. An AI agent that submits a homeowners RFQ without these fields, or without the CLUE consent declaration, is sending an incomplete request that no licensed agency can act on.

The mechanics of agent intake for auto — structured email, named insured block, vehicle block, MVR consent — are covered in our pieces on personal lines agent intake and what agencies need to receive an agent RFQ. Homeowners follows the same structural logic but with a different data block at its core. This article covers what that block needs to contain, why each field matters to the underwriting decision, and how agencies can publish a homeowners intake specification that agents can actually follow.

What fields does a homeowners RFQ need to include?

A complete homeowners RFQ needs five data blocks: (1) the named insured with the property address (street, city, state, ZIP — not just the mailing address if different), (2) the property characteristics block (dwelling type, year built, square footage, number of stories, construction type, roof material and year), (3) the coverage intent block (desired Coverage A limit or requested replacement cost estimate, current policy expiration if this is a replacement quote), (4) the prior claims block (any homeowners claims in the last five years, even if paid by a prior carrier), and (5) the CLUE consent declaration — the consumer's authorization to pull a Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange property report. Without the consent, carriers cannot access the claims database that drives much of the underwriting decision.

The property address is the most basic field and the one most often submitted incorrectly when an agent is working from a consumer profile built for other purposes. The address that underwrites a homeowners policy is the insured location, not the policyholder's mailing address. These are the same for owner-occupied properties, but diverge for rental properties, vacation homes, and snowbird situations. An agent submitting intake for a consumer should always confirm which address is the property to be insured.

Field blockKey fieldsWhy it matters
Insured property addressFull street address including unit (no PO Box), city, state, ZIPZIP and geocode drive territory rating, wildfire/flood exposure zone, distance-to-fire-station, and which carriers are even admitted in that area
Dwelling characteristicsType (SFR/condo/townhome/manufactured), year built, sq. ft., stories, construction (frame/masonry/mixed), roof material (asphalt/tile/metal/wood shake), roof yearRoof age and material are primary eligibility screens for many carriers — a wood shake roof over 15 years old is an automatic declination at most admitted markets
Coverage intentDesired Coverage A ($), or "replacement cost estimate requested"; Coverage C personal property; liability limit; loss of use; current carrier and expirationAgents cannot quote without a target Coverage A; if the consumer does not know, request a replacement cost estimate — do not fabricate a number
Prior claimsAny homeowners claims in the past 5 years: date, peril, amount paid, carrierTwo or more claims in three years triggers surcharge or declination at most carriers; water/mold claims are often individually disqualifying
CLUE consentConsumer authorization to pull CLUE property report; identity of the authorizing individual; date of authorizationCLUE is a consumer report under FCRA — pulling it without authorization is a regulatory violation, not just a policy gap

How does CLUE consent work differently for homeowners than MVR consent works for auto?

CLUE property consent and MVR consent are both FCRA consumer report authorizations, but they attach to different subjects. MVR consent authorizes inquiry into the named driver's motor vehicle record — it is always associated with a person. CLUE property consent authorizes inquiry into the claims history of a specific property address — it can be associated with the current owner, a prior owner, or both depending on the carrier and the underwriting purpose. An agent submitting a homeowners RFQ must obtain authorization from the named insured (the person who will own the policy), and the consent declaration must reference the property address being queried, not just the consumer's identity.

The practical consequence for agents: if a consumer asks an AI agent to shop homeowners insurance, the agent must capture explicit CLUE consent before submitting to any agency. The agent cannot assume that general intake consent — "I authorize you to share my information" — covers a CLUE pull. CLUE is a named report type under FCRA, and authorization must be specific enough that a reasonable person would understand they are authorizing a property claims history inquiry. Our piece on FCRA consent and AI agents covers the authorization mechanics that apply across report types.

Wildfire and flood exposure are underwriting questions, not field notes. In California and other high-hazard states, the property's exposure zone — CAL FIRE's Fire Hazard Severity Zone designation, FEMA flood zone — determines carrier eligibility before any other underwriting factor. Agents submitting homeowners RFQs in these states should include the CAL FIRE zone if known, or explicitly request that the agency run a zone lookup as part of eligibility screening. Submitting without it adds a round-trip to the intake process that delays every quote.

How should an agency publish its homeowners intake specification?

An agency's homeowners intake specification should live in its published agent-facing profile and define three things: the exact fields required for a complete homeowners RFQ (using the five-block structure above), the CLUE consent language it requires agents to obtain before submitting, and the response format the agency will send back (quote, declination with reason, pending-information request, or referral to surplus lines). An agent that reads the specification before submitting knows whether the request it is about to send is complete. That reduces back-and-forth, reduces response window pressure, and produces a cleaner documentation trail for E&O purposes.

The specification does not need to be a legal document. It needs to be specific enough that an agent's system can use it to validate a request before submission. The agencies that publish clear homeowners specifications — listing which roof materials require photos, which claims histories trigger automatic non-standard referral, which coverage amounts trigger a replacement cost inspection requirement — are the ones that receive actionable RFQs rather than incomplete requests that stall in triage.

EYMA — the place where legitimate licensed bots go to sell their humans' products — is where agencies publish the intake specifications that define what they can receive and act on. A homeowners-capable agency profile at eyma.ai/agent-intake tells agents the line-of-business-specific fields required, the consent declarations needed, and the territory the agency actually writes. The machine-readable version of those specifications flows into the feed at eyma.ai/registry.json, so agents building homeowners shopping workflows can query which agencies accept homeowners RFQs in a given state and territory without guessing.

The homeowners line sits at an interesting moment in the agent economy. Auto intake has clear, repeatable field sets — VIN, MVR, driver record. Homeowners underwriting is more property-specific, more geography-specific, and more dependent on inspection and photo requirements that vary by carrier and territory. The agencies that publish explicit homeowners intake specifications are creating a competitive advantage: agents building reliable shopping workflows will route requests to the agencies whose specifications they can validate against, and away from the agencies that require a human to decode an ambiguous email before the process can start.

For a live example of a published agent intake specification that agents can read and build against, see viarapidaservices.com/agents.html. The data minimization principles that apply to all agent RFQs — request only what you need to act on — are covered in our piece on agent RFQ data minimization. For agents handling commercial property, the commercial lines intake requirements are covered in commercial lines agent intake.

Publish your homeowners intake spec — free at EYMA.
Agents building homeowners shopping workflows need to know which agencies accept the line, in which territories, with which field requirements. Publish your specification and agents can validate requests before they send them.
Publish your intake profile at EYMA

Live example: viarapidaservices.com/agents.html · machine-readable feed: eyma.ai/registry.json