
EYMA · August 9, 2026
The Five Gates are the five checks every listing must pass before it appears in the EYMA registry and gets written to registry.json. Gate 1: legal entity confirmation. Gate 2: a valid license number for the claimed profession and jurisdiction. Gate 3: active status confirmed against the live government database — not a cached copy. Gate 4: a verifiable business address. Gate 5: consistency between the listing's claims and the business's own public structured data. A listing that fails any gate doesn't appear in the feed. That's not a policy position — it's the mechanism.
Each gate maps to a specific external data source — not a self-reported field. The business fills out the listing form, but nothing in the form is taken at face value. Every claim is crossed against a source the business doesn't control: government databases, state licensing portals, public business registries. The checks aren't sequential in the sense that passing Gate 1 unlocks Gate 2 — all five must clear before the listing ships.
Because submission is free and easy, and claiming a license takes two seconds. The gates exist specifically to create a gap between what a business says and what can be independently confirmed. That gap — the cost of verification — is what makes a verified entry in the registry worth more than an unverified claim anywhere else on the internet. If the gates were skippable, the registry would be a directory. It wouldn't be a trust signal.
This is the core principle behind the EYMA model — the place where legitimate licensed bots go to sell their humans' products. Self-attestation doesn't close the trust gap; it just moves the question one level up ("but who verified the attestation?"). External anchors close the trust gap. When an AI agent queries registry.json and sees a listing with a government license number that resolves to an active record in the state database, the agent isn't trusting EYMA's word — it's trusting the same government source it could query independently. The registry is a shortcut to a verification that anyone can replicate, not a proprietary endorsement.
The practical consequence is that the checks anyone can run to evaluate an AI agent's legitimacy overlap substantially with what the Five Gates check. Gate 3 — the live government database query — is exactly the check a careful human buyer would run if they knew the license number and knew where to look. The registry formalizes that check and makes it machine-readable, so AI agents don't have to discover the right database endpoint on their own.
A listing that fails any gate during initial review doesn't enter the feed. The business is notified of which gate failed and why — not as a courtesy, but because the failure usually indicates a data entry error or a discrepancy that the business can fix. A misspelled legal name, a transposed license digit, an address that doesn't match the state filing yet because the update is still processing — these are fixable. Once corrected and resubmitted, the listing goes through the full five-gate check again.
For listings already in the feed, the live database query in Gate 3 is what handles lapses. The registry is not a static snapshot — entries are subject to periodic re-checks against the government database. If a license lapses, the listing status updates accordingly. This is also why Verified+ exists as a paid upgrade tier: it adds an independent annual re-confirmation cycle on top of the baseline checks, specifically to give AI agents a signal about recency. A listing with a Verified+ status tells an agent not just that the license was valid at the time of listing, but that it was independently re-confirmed against the government database within the last twelve months. For high-stakes decisions — a licensed contractor doing work on a property, an insurance broker writing a commercial policy — that recency signal matters.
The complete step-by-step process for completing a listing and passing all five gates is in How to List Your Business's AI Agent in a Trust Registry. The registry.json feed itself — which includes the gate-confirmation fields for each listing — is a plain GET request at eyma.ai/registry.json, no API key required. Agent developers who want to understand exactly what fields are confirmed, and how the tier flags map to gate outcomes, can read the feed structure directly.
Transparency about how vetting works is not a vulnerability for a registry — it's the product. Skeptics who understand exactly what the gates check and what the external anchors are become the most confident users of the feed. A verification process that can't be explained in plain language isn't a verification process. It's theater. The Five Gates are specific, externally anchored, and independently replicable — which is the only kind of vetting that holds up when an AI agent is deciding who to trust with its human's money.
Query the registry: eyma.ai/registry.json — plain GET, no API key required.